At every point
in time since the 1967 – 1970 Civil War, Public opinion in Nigeria has been
United over its condemnation of government. Politics is too violent, government
officials have no respect for the rule of law and virtually all of them,
rightly or wrongly are viewed as crooks whose sole purpose is self aggrandizement,
and personal enrichment. Service in order to improve the quality of life for
the electorate is never part of their plan. Consider the several, attempts that
have been made to change this deploratale state of affairs; General Murtala Mohammed’s
Coup which ousted General Yakubu Gowon (1976), General Obasanjo’s
Administration which organized democratic elections that brought in Alhaji
Shehu Shagari (1979), General Muhammadu Buhari’s Coup which ousted Shagari
(1983), General Ibrahim Babangida’s Coup which ousted Buhari (1985), the
military Coup of General Sani Abacha which ended Babangida’s rule and
Shonekan’s one month surrogate assignment (1993), the democratic governments of
General Olusegun Obasanjo (1999 – 2007), Shehu Yar’adua (2007 – 2009), and
Goodluck Jonathan (2009 – 2015), were all laudable attempts at good governance.
Each one of them pledged to bring about a higher level of Peace, Security, and
Prosperity to Nigeria. Unfortunately for Nigerians they have all failed in
varying degrees.
The
current administration of Muhammadu Buhari unfortunately has only depended the
debacle. Since Buhari took office in May 2015, the country’s Gross Domestic
Product has dropped, the Stock Market is down, Direct Foreign, Investment has
fallen, and the naira, at 400 to the dollar is at its weakest in living memory.
Social and political life fare no better than the economy. Our National
Assembly is a virtual war zone. And with the agitation of the various
pro-Biafra groups, the marauding Fulani herdsmen’s, the Niger Delta militants
and the ongoing war against Boko Haram it can be said that the country is on
the verge of becoming a failed state. In
the opinion of Federalists and other social analysts, the fundamental reason
for the inept social, political and economic performance of the country so far
is the failure of Central government to actualize the tenets of federalism.
A Federalist
state is one in which several states unite under a central authority while
maintaining a large degree of independence. Ironically the 1953 proposal by Sir
Ahmadu Bello, the Premier of Northern Nigeria, would have achieved that
autonomy. Consider the Sardauna’s
proposal as follows:
1.
That each region shall have
complete Legislative and Executive Autonomy with respect to all matters except
the following External Affairs Defence, Customs and West African Research
Institutions;
2.
That there should be no
Central legislative body and no Central Executive or Policy making body for the
whole of Nigeria;
3.
That there shall be Central
Agency for all regions which will be responsible for matters mentioned in
paragraph (1) and other matters delegated to it by a Region;
4.
That the Central agency
shall be a neutral place preferably Lagos.
5.
That the composition and
responsibility of the Central Agency shall be defined by the order in council
establishing the constitutional arrangement. The agency shall be a
non-political body;
6.
That the services of
railway, air, posts and telegraphs, electricity and coal mining, shall be
organized on an inter-regional basis and shall be administered by public
corporations. These corporations shall be independent and covered by the
statutes under which they are created by the board of experts with a minority representation
of the regional governments;
7.
All the revenues shall be
levied and collected by the regional government except revenue at the port of
discharge by the Central Agency and paid to its treasury;
8.
The administration of the
Customs shall be so organized so as to assume that goods consigned to the
region are separately cleared and charged to duty. Each region shall have a
separate public service.
The closest the
Nation got to this progressive type of system was during the period immediately
following independence. Unfortunately the relative autonomy enjoyed under the
Regional Government Structure was truncated by the Civil war military
administration of General Aguiyi Ironsi. The Unitary System of Government
instituted by General Ironsi was adapted and intensified by his successor,
General Yakubu Gowon. That overt centralization of power damaged the nation’s
economy significantly. Nigeria’s infatuation with crude oil which destroyed our
work ethic began then. Dependence on oil revenue wiped out the Groundnut and
Hyde and Skin industries in the North. Coal and palm oil production in the East
ceased. Rubber no longer came from the Mid-West. People lost interest in mining
tin and coal in North central, and the cocoa farms of the Western region became
veritable waste lands. The adverse effect of over centralization was not
limited to the economy. It also can be felt in our social life, in safety and
security, in political stability, and in electoral integrity.
The
north’s request that each region should have “complete legislative and
executive autonomy with respect to all matters except, External Affair,
Defence, Customs and West African Research institutions” sums it up adequately.
This is identical to the structure that works well for the United States of America;
a country which like Nigeria is composed of states with differing levels of
development. A similar Federalist System is operated in India which has a high
level of ethnic diversity, and a high poverty rate like Nigeria. In India, only
15% of state, internally Generated Revenue (IGR) is paid to the center. It is
this strength accorded the units which accounts for the remarkable growth of
India’s economy in the last two decades. It also accounts for the political
stability and economic strength of a country like the United States of America.
Real federalism enables a country to enjoy the most positive dividends of
democracy.
The underlining
purpose of the 2014 National Convention is to make Nigeria a better nation,
with an efficient and more equitable governmental structure. At the core of the
convention’s recommendation is that the Nigerian nation must be decentralized
in order to make governance easier to manage. Consider some of the convention’s
ideas on how to achieve this purpose; (culled from Main Report of the March
2014 National Conference):
1.
Eighteen (18) more states
should be created bringing the total number of states to fifty four (54).
2.
The number of geo-political
zones will remain at six (6), but for the purpose of fairness each of the zones
should have, an equal number of nine states. At the present time, the North –
Central, North – West, South–West, and South – East each have six states, the
North - East has seven states, and the South–South
only five).
3.
Local Government areas shall
access the federation account directly, and the political and financial
independence of Local Government Areas shall be guaranteed by law.
4.
The office of President
shall be rotated between the North and the South, and amongst the six (6)
geo-political zones.
5.
The office of the Governor
shall rotate among the three (3) Senatorial Districts in that state.
6.
The office of a Chairman of
a Local Government Council shall rotate within the Local Government Areas.
7.
Public Funds should no
longer be made available to political parties. Consequently, it is recommended
that section 228 (C) of the 1999 constitution be deleted.
8.
The percentage of revenue
allocation to states producing oil (and other resources), should be reviewed
upwards.
9.
The revenue to states for
the exploration and development of natural resources should be increased.
10. A state police force and a Local Government Police Force
should be established.
Recommendations
(ix) and (x) above which deal with state financing and revenue generation will
enable states to be economically empowered as never before. Their ability to
utilize the natural resources within their domain unabated is arguably the most
significant characteristic of true federalism. Consider the following
statistics which indicate that virtually every state in all the six (6)
geo-political zones of the country has natural resources which if appropriately
exploited will upgrade the quality of life of its citizens to the level of that
of developed countries.
The following
table illustrates the mineral resources and the cash crops available within
each state of the federation.
S/N
|
State
|
Mineral
Resources
|
Cash
Crops
|
1.
|
Abia
|
Petroleum,
lead, zince, limestone
|
Palm
produce, maize, yam, rice, cassava, fruits, vegetables
|
2.
|
Adamawa
|
Iron,
lead, zinc, limestone, baryles
|
Cotton,
groundnut, guinea corn, millet, maize
|
3.
|
Akwa Ibom
|
Crude
oil, limestone, clay, coal
|
Palm
produce, rubber, cocoa, rice, yam
|
4.
|
Anambra
|
Sandstones,
Natural gas, lignite, tungstem
|
Yam, cassave, maize, rice, végétales
|
5.
|
Bauchi
|
Gold,
columbium, coal, limestone
|
Maize,
rice, millet, guinea corn, groundnut
|
6.
|
Bayelsa
|
Crude
oil
|
Palm
produce, cassava, rice, timber, fish
|
7.
|
Benue
|
Limestone,
marble, tin, columbite
|
Yam,
soya beans, cassava, oil palm
|
8.
|
Borno
|
Uranium,
clay, potagium, limestone, diatomite
|
Groundnut,
sorghum, sugar case, wheat, sweet potatoes
|
9.
|
Cross River
|
Limestone,
tin ore, cranite, calcium
|
Yam,
cassava, coconut, palm oil, maize
|
10.
|
Delta
|
Crude
oil, limestone
|
Palm
oil, yam, cassava, maize
|
11.
|
Eboinyi
|
Marble,
lead
|
Rice,
maize, cassava
|
12.
|
Edo
|
Marble,
crude oil
|
Yam,
cassava, fruits, vegetables
|
13.
|
Ekiti
|
Kaolin,
bauxite, limestone, calcium
|
Plantain,
yam, pepper
|
14.
|
Enugu
|
Coal,
natural gas
|
Rice,
maize, cassava
|
15.
|
Gombe
|
Limestone,
gypsum, cushion
|
Maize,
sorghum, millet, beans, groundnut
|
16.
|
Imo
|
Zinc,
petroleum, salt, limestone
|
Yam,
cassava, cocoa yam, maize
|
17.
|
Jigawa
|
Kaolin,
tourmaline, potash, iron, oil, copper
|
Groundnut,
millet, guinea corn
|
18.
|
Kaduna
|
Serpentine,
asbestos, gold, clay, graphite
|
Yam,
cotton, groundnut, maize beans, ginger
|
19.
|
Katsina
|
Kaolin,
asbestos
|
Cotton,
groundnut maize, wheat
|
20.
|
Kano
|
Niubolin,
kaolin, tantalum, columbite
|
Groundnut,
cotton, livestock, wheat
|
21.
|
Kebbi
|
Kaolin,
bauxite, potassium, silica, sand
|
Wheat,
millet, guinea corn, sugar case, beans, groundnut
|
22.
|
Kogi
|
Tantalite,
marble
|
Yam,
cassava, maize
|
23.
|
Kwara
|
Quartz,
granite rocks, marble, clay, gold
|
Cotton,
coffee, cocoa, tobacco, beam seed, palm produce
|
24.
|
Lagos
|
Clay,
Kaolin, silica sand, crude oil
|
Cassava,
maize, rice, fish, yam
|
25.
|
Nasarawa
|
Salt,
bauxite
|
Yam,
cassava, maize, rice
|
26.
|
Niger
|
Clay,
gold, silica, Granite, marble, copper
|
Guinea
corn, rice, yam, millet groundnut, cotton
|
27.
|
Ogun
|
Limestone,
phosphate, clay, chalk, stone
|
Kolanute,
cocoa, oil palm, cassava, yam, maize
|
28.
|
Ondo
|
Crude
oil, limestone, calcium, bauxite (coal tar)
|
Yam,
coffee, timber, palm oil, rice, kolanut
|
29.
|
Osun
|
Gold,
clay, limestone, granite, kaolin
|
Cassava,
maize, cocoyam, cashew, yam
|
30.
|
Oyo
|
Aquamarine,
clay, tin, columbite, Gold, Tourmaline
|
Yam, cassava, millet, maize,
cocoa, beans, platina
|
31.
|
Plateau
|
Cussiterite,
Barytes
|
Cowpeas,
yam, cassava, guinea corn, maize, irish potatoes, millet
|
32.
|
River
|
Crude
oil
|
Plantain,
cassava, oil palm, coconut, raffia
|
33.
|
Sokoto
|
Gypsum,
phosphate, limestone, clay, silica
|
Wheat,
maize, groundnut, beans
|
34.
|
Taraba
|
Uranium
|
Maize,
yam, millet, sorghum, groundnut
|
35.
|
Yobe
|
Potash,
Gypsum
|
Groundnut,
millet, guinea corn
|
36.
|
Zamfara
|
Phosphate,
Limestone, Gold
|
Cotton,
groundnut, wheat
|
With such an
abundance of mineral resources, it is impossible to justify the country’s
reliance on only crude oil as a mineral resource. Exploration for oil began in
the Niger Delta sub-region during the last decade of colonial rule, and its
extraction began in earnest between 1958 and 1960. This means that in essence
no administration in Nigeria since independence has invested in the
exploitation of any other mineral resource. Here is a shameful example of lack
of leadership, foresight, and initiative. Oil is a wasting asset. The more of
it is extracted, the less of it is left underground. Its operations, the gas
flares, construction of over land, or underground pipelines, the digging and
fitting of oil wells are all detrimental to human health, plant life, marine
life, and the environment. Some countries such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and Russia
have deposits of oil in such huge quantities that they can at any given time, for
economic or political expediency destabilize the world price. It is in order to
avert these negatives of the oil industry that forward looking governments all
over the world have been engaged in active search for alternative sources of
energy, and they are finding them in crops like sugar cane, and maize.
Beside the fluctuations
in the production and price of oil, there is the commonsense argument that
depending on it or any one product as a sole source of revenue is bad economics.
Over eighty percent (80%) of Nigeria’s reserve is oil dependent. This policy
has led to a self-imposed poverty. Diversification
from oil does not mean that the country will earn less from oil, it simply
means that the other products will provide additional sources of income.
Nigeria is blessed with natural resources which include gold, coal, tin ore,
granite, calcium, lime stone, lead, zinc, sand stones, marble, columbine, bauxite,
uranium, natural gas, kaolin, asbestos, silica and iron are. The addition of
their cash crops which include palm oil, rubber, cocoa, cassava, ground nut,
rice, cotton, sorghum, soya beans, yam, maize, timber and wheat confirms the
economic viability of every single state of the federation. All that is needed
to unleash the potential of the people of Nigeria to thrive like never before
is for the National Assembly to repeal the retrogressive item No. 39 of the
Second Schedule of the Exclusive legislative List in the 1999 constitution. The
economic independence of states will set the foundation for material prosperity
as well as for good governance. This new structure will impact positively the
lives of citizens at all levels, particularly at the local level from where the
vast majority of citizens operate.
Dr. Adetokunbo Pearse is a Public
Affairs Analyst, and a Senior Lecturer in the department of English at the
University of Lagos. From 1986 to 2006, Dr. Pearse worked as a political
consultant in the USA, where he also taught in Universities including Chicago
State University, IL, Brooklyn College, N.Y., Mercy College, Dobbss Ferry,
N.Y., and Hunter College N.Y.
No comments:
Post a Comment